Learner Motivation- Reflection
I learned so much
in this class but what was surprising to me was the way that adult learners
learn. I didn’t know that there was a
much of a difference between adult learns and children other than the external
distraction of work, family, and time management issues. However, after reading the article by Orey (2001)
from the projects website, http://projects.coe.uga.edu/epltt/index.php?title=Main_Page,
I found that the information on adult learners was very relevant and true to my
experience in my degree program that I recently finished and now in this new
certificate program.
How has this course deepened your
understanding of your personal learning process?
I had not heard
of the different learning theories prior to this class and have an
understanding now about what I need to learn.
I like the constructivism and the cognitivist theories as being the best
match for my learning styles (Ormrod, Schunk, and Gredler, 2009). I do like to do things hands on and make the
information relevant to me as a way understand and learn. Gardner’s article on Multiple Intelligence put
a lot of facts behind the believe that I grew up with that different people had
different kinds of “smarts” (2003). I
grew up knowing the difference between my brother and I and how he was so good
at math while I was not. Multiple
Intelligence gives me a better understanding of people and the way our minds
work.
What have you
learned regarding the connection between learning theories, learning styles,
educational technology, and motivation?
Completing the
Learning Theories Matrix made me aware that each different learning style
responds best to different technology and each has different external or
internal motivations to learn. As an
instructional designer, I am going to have to know how to set up class so that
all the different styles of learners that make up my student base, can get the
information presented to them in a style that is familiar. This class gave me some tools to work with
such as reading the different authors like Keller (1999) and O’Bannon, Puckett,
and Rakes (2006) who both have great ideas and opinions on how to use
technology to teach visual learners and distance learners. Both of which, are of interest to me.
How will your
learning in this course help you as you further your career in the field of
instructional design?
Everything presented in this course will be of use as a
foundation in my instructional design efforts.
Knowing your different students is of the utmost importance and being
able to draw from the different learning theories that I am aware of will help
me be more aware of my student’s needs.
The ARCS –based strategies presented by Hutt, Moller, Young, Bray, and Hutt
(2008) really tried everything together for me.
I believe that if I keep these principles in my class design, I will be
successful as an instructional designer.
It I all about keeping the Attention, Relevance, Confidence, and
Satisfaction of the students who are in my class so that they will remain
motivated to learn.
References
Gardner,
H. (2003, April 21). Multiple intelligences after 20 years. Paper presented to
the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL. Retrieved from
http://www.pz.harvard.edu/PIs/HG_MI_after_20_years.pdf
Huett,
J., Moller, L., Young, J., Bray, M., & Huett, K. (2008). Supporting the
distant student: The effect of ARCS-based strategies on confidence and
performance. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 9(2), 113–126.
Keller,
J. M. (1999). Using the ARCS motivational process in computer-based instruction
and distance education. New Directions for Teaching and Learning (78).
O'Bannon,
B., Puckett, K., & Rakes, G. (2006). Using technology to support visual
learning strategies. Computers in the Schools, 23(1/2), 125–137.
Orey,
M. (Ed.). (2001). Emerging perspectives on learning, teaching, and technology.
Retrieved from http://projects.coe.uga.edu/epltt/index.php?title=Main_Page.
Ormrod,
J., Schunk, D., & Gredler, M. (2009). Learning theories and instruction
(Laureate custom edition). New York: Pearson.